|

The
Novels
The
Man In The Glass Booth
(1967)

Shaw pictured
with Donald Pleasence in the London production of his
two part play The Man in the Glass Booth.

Robert Shaw
did not act for most of 1967. It wasn't that
opportunity wasn't knocking, it was just that he had
become more selective in his roles. Shaw had
finally earned the respect he deserved as an author and
admitted, "there's a legend around that all actors are
stupid." He preferred writing, stating that
acting revealed his childlike side. An American
producer had once said to him, "For Christ's sake Bob,
write another book, we need some more prestige."
Shaw was becoming very serious about his subjects,
stating that "My books get blacker and blacker.
I'm trying to cut out completely any idea of appealing
to an audience."
It has been
seen by many to be anti-Semitic when in fact it was actually the
opposite. Shaw was quite horrified to learn of the
atrocities as a young man and he was quoted
defending it by saying, "First, Goldman sees that he
lives in a very stupid and cruel world, where terrible
things like the Nazi atrocities have been going on for
centuries and no one has yet learned a damn thing from
any of them. Two, he is convinced that it is time
for Jews to forgive the Germans. Not forget
exactly but forgive. Three, he wants to stand up
in court and publicly acknowledge a guilt that no true
Nazi would ever acknowledge. And he is an old man,
and wants one last grand gesture...That's all...Goldman
is not a psychotic, a masochist or a Christ figure.
He is Christ-like only in that he is courageous."
Funny, I understood this when I was only 12, having
borrowed the book from our local library.
Goldman is a
wealthy New York industrialist, living in a luxurious
Manhattan high-rise, surrounding himself with antique
furniture, rich draperies and paintings. He shocks
his assistant Charlie with his outrageous outbursts,
mood swings and barking commands at him constantly.
Goldman starts to act
even stranger after hearing the Pope officially forgiving
the Jews for the death of Christ. At one point,
the reader begins to wonder if he is actually Adolf Dorff, a former SS officer as he is abducted by Israeli
agents and put on trial for mass murder. There is
even a room, filled with Nazi memorabilia, and he tries
to burn the SS number and blood type from his arm on the
night before his arrest. The trial, similar to that of Adolph Eichmann which actually
took place in 1960, has Goldman
sitting in a glass booth facing his accusers.
There is a final twist. Goldman, in full Nazi
uniform, is talking about the holocaust and the Nazi's
hatred of Jews, admitting to all the crimes without
hesitation, describing them in great detail when an old woman identifies him as
Arthur Goldman, a concentration camp survivor.
He is not a Nazi, possibly not a Jew either.
Goldman appears to have falsified the dental records the
Israelis used to identify him, to bring about the trial. He locks himself in the glass booth, takes off his
uniform, a seemingly broken man and that is the end of the play.
Is Goldman actually Dorf or vice versa one is left
wondering?
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/biographies/eichmann.htm
Shaw said
that he had wanted to "send people out of the theatre
pondering." He was not the type of playwright to
spoon feed his critics. It was seen as both a very
controversial and thought provoking play about the
horrors of the holocaust and man's inhumanity to man.
If Hitler had chosen the Jews instead would they have
followed him as well and carried out the same crimes
against humanity and war crimes? This is obvious in
Goldman's speech at the end, "people of Israel, if he
had chosen you...if he had chosen you...you also would
have followed where he led."

Donald Pleasence
and Paul Michael Glaser in the Broadway production of
Shaw's play, The Man in the Glass Booth.

A
Card From Morocco
(1969)

Robert Shaw
began writing his fifth novel on the set of The Royal
Hunt of the Sun. Originally called "The Two
Gentlemen of Madrid", then "The Telegram", he was
finding it harder to write with his increasing family
and the film work he would find necessary to support
them. He was quoted as saying, "I believe that if
I didn't act I'd write three times as much but, on the
other hand, earning a bit of money as an actor gives me
total freedom as a writer. And I have this huge
family and I like to live well." His demanding
schedule of the late sixties made it only possible for
him to write short works.
A Card From
Morocco is the story of two men, an Englishman and an
American who meet over drinks in Madrid and share
stories of their troubles. Slattery is the
American, he was previously an athlete but is now a
painter. Lewis is the Englishman, a wealthy man
but unlucky at love. Their meetings usually end in
an argument, as Slattery seems to be a
"mean drunk" but more is revealed about their lives
following each quarrel. The two opposites form an
unlikely bond and Slattery reveals himself to Lewis by
stating, "There is no way to cure me, I am too
intelligent." This has been translated to be Shaw
reflecting on his own intelligence and it is said that
many of the characteristics of each character could be
found in Shaw. This is an excerpt from More Than A Life,
the biography by Carmean and
Gaston. This is speculative and in itself, open to
interpretation. I never knew Robert Shaw or met
the man in person. I am not a journalist, nor do I
have the same freedom of speech. I am simply
quoting the biography to give everyone a better
understanding of what the novel is purportedly about,
having found it somewhat confusing myself. I
understood the rest of Shaw's works.
Shaw was
also said to be refining his own art, revealed in a
scene between the two men when Slattery is giving Lewis
a lesson in painting. Shaw was trying to
amalgamate fantasy, fiction and drama so that the reader
would feel like they were taking part in a dream.
The London
Times described the book as being "terse, poetic" and
The New York Times saw it as a "sharply controlled
story." Other critics found the novel "hard to follow"
and a "dull novel." The New Yorker criticized that
it was indeed a boring story with "absurd pasteboard
characters."
Robert
Shaw's greatest criticism would come from his eldest
daughter Debbie's teacher at Wycombe Abbey's school for
girls. "Your father cannot write. I do enjoy
his stories. But his grammar is appalling."
He could but once again I must add that he did not spoon
feed his readers and for some, that can be rather unsettling. Shaw would later ask Debbie to be his secretary whilst
writing The Ice Floe, his last and unfinished novel.

The
Ice Floe
"If
we do exit in the midday of our lives."
That line,
from Robert Shaw's last and unfinished novel, was
chillingly written in the last twenty four hours of his
life. He had been struggling to come up with an
ending to his novel, one which had taken him seven years
to write. Shaw found old age "a terrifying
subject" and one that made him feel "haunted." He
truly believed that it would bring him the literary
recognition he had desired for so many years. The
kind of recognition that he was hoping would surpass his
acting talent.
"As you grow
older, you start to think more deeply about things that
don't really concern you when you're young, like
religion-it's self-induced human comfort. It would
be very nice to believe it all. I'd love to, I'm
an atheist. The agnostic view is much tougher.
There are no props except yourself."
It was
originally entitled Flesh and Blood, the story of a
kind of uprising in a retirement home. The
protagonist is an old Spaniard who marries an even older
woman. All is well until his grandson writes to
him from Viet Nam, telling him that he is going to
contemplating suicide. The plan is to get the boys out
with a regiment that swells to 200,000 and goes as far
as buying a boat for the planned rescue.
"You have
daughters and you have sons. Do what you can.
Leave to them what is best in you. If we do exit
in the midday of our lives...let us go by the only doors
still worthy of opening. And let us leave as many
bricks behind as we can."
Shaw never
finished the novel, even though he had found a suitable
ending he was finally satisfied with. He would die
of a massive heart attack the following day, August 28,
1978.
Most excerpts
were taken from the biography More Than A Life, Carmean
and Gaston.
Images and text may not be reproduced without
permission.
|